WEB LOG
CONTACT
ABOUT GENTRY
ENDORSEMENTS
CALENDAR
PLATFORM
FAQ
ASK GENTRY
VOLUNTEERS
USERS LOGIN
DONATIONS
PRESS ROOM
PODCAST
VIDEO
 

Gentry Lange
Real solutions to today's problems

Welcome to Gentry Lange's campaign site!

Here you will find information on:

Voting Reform

Traffic Solutions

Sustainable Technology

Gentry Lange

 

Council Meeting Update
JUNE 5th, 2006

I attended the King County Council Meeting today.

Not one member of the public spoke out in favor of FORCED MAIL VOTING. Not one.

Why isn't the media covering this on King 5 news? I think the 80% of the public voting with their feet argument would evaporate overnight if the media publicized the problems everyone objected to, the whole meeting long. The media isn't just a few of us lonely bloggers out here on the Internet. The media is not raising public awareness of the issue. The citizens at that meeting didn't need the media to tell them to oppose vote by mail, they all opposed it simply through logical thought and argumentation.

How many people spoke, how many issues raised? And the council that's voting in favor of the measure, all stating that the citizenry supports it, but no citizen there to speak in favor of forced mail-in voting. And the most appalling thing is that many Democratic Council members all said that everyone was raising "valid concerns". Well if they are valid? Why are you ignoring them?

There were Greens, Republicans, and many Democrats who spoke passionately against this change. I think that in opposition to one council member who wishes not to be called out by independent journalists, this is a coalition of many people, from many parties, all opposing this idea.

That meeting was a powerful coalition of people from a broad spectrum of citizens, and the citizens were pissed.

Please contact the media and ask them why they are not covering this issue. Ken Schram seems open to the idea, judging from his commentary in 2004. If you want you could email him, I already have, see if maybe he would host a discussion panel with all the various citizen activists discussing this switch. He hasn't responded to my email yet.

 

 

Statement on Absentee Ballots

The proposal to move King County to a mixed system of vote by mail (VBM) and Diebold TSX Touch Screen Voting machines deserves rejection.

For hundreds of years citizens of the United States have voted in public, and the votes have been counted in public, by the public. The proposal before the King County Council will fundamentally alter that here in King County. We will be voting in private, and the votes will be counted by private hands using private software, with only the illusion that it remains a public process.

The voting machines in King County, with software already controlled by corporate hands, namely Diebold Election Systems, still have a paper ballot associated with that system... useful in hand recounts. But moving to vote by mail undermines the security of the paper ballots, and removes any real ability to audit the system. Absentee ballots, rather than correcting the software ownership problem I highlighted in my campaign for King County Executive, simply make matters worse by undermining the security of the paper ballot. For the record, if you are trying to avoid the machines by using absentee ballots, absentee ballots are fed into Diebold counting machines anyway. This is exactly what the hand recount in 2004 should have called into question, something that seemed to slip unnoticed by the public and the media. Specifically the hand count overturned two machine counts.

Click to read the entire statement...

News, Info, and Links

Campaigning Outside the Lines: A Formula for Exclusion
Lansing Scott
http://eatthestate.org/10-06/CampaigningOutsideLines.htm
Many people are aware that our electoral system is biased in favor of the two dominant parties and against smaller parties, but the campaign of Gentry Lange, this year's Green Party candidate for King County Executive, provides a useful case study of just how bad that bias really is.

5% Goes Green in King County
Thanks to everyone who voted for me, we are closing in on 25,000 votes when everything is counted, and all the ballots are "found". And before anyone writes me some nasty email about GOP talking points, the fact is that during the last election both Andy Stephenson and Larry Phillips absentees were "found" a little late in the process. So I am skeptical about King County and Dean Logan for reasons far beyond GOP talking points. Heck, the GOP started stealing my talking points this election cycle, not the other way around.

While this campaign was issue driven, not "victory driven", I am super proud of everyone who worked on the campaign, volunteered, attended house parties, and generally kicked butt to get things done. After 6 months of constant ups and downs, I am proud to call myself a Green, and happy it is all over... for now. The current plan is to take a break, spend some time in the mountains snowboarding, and then to return to work on reforming King County's election system, fixing traffic, and pushing for more Green Technologies, Industries, and sustainable life styles.

Keep in Touch!

Regards,

Gentry Lange

Breaking News:
Touch Screens from Diebold for King County
Breaking news, Diebold to spend $5 million to buy the worst voting machines Diebold offers. Here's the info:

"I attended the HAVA Grant Advisory Board meeting 10/27. Among many other things, I learned that we (King Co) are spending $5m for 650 Diebold AccuVote TSx voting machines (DREs). That includes software, support, consulting, etc."

More info on Washblog here:
http://www.washblog.com/

What is wrong with outsourcing voting tasks to experts?
Aren't Diebold and PSI Group simply vendors providing a service to the county?  Isn't this a very cost effective decision for the county to make?  Companies do it every day; those tasks that are not in their core competencies are provided by outside experts.  What is wrong with this?

Read my full response to this question, here.

The KUOW interview
http://www.kuow.org/theconversation.asp
Gentry Lange on Ross Reynold's, The Conversation.

A vote for Gentry Lange is a vote for Gentry Lange. Period.
Debunking the "Spoiler" Myth
By Mike Gillis

I reject the so-called "spoiler effect" and the way that the Democratic Party has used it to take advantage of progressive voters for decades.
The governorship of Washington State, both state legislative houses and the Supreme Court in Washington State are controlled by one party: The Democrats.
If they wished to change the system to prevent candidates with only a minority of the electorate's support from being elected to office, they would have. They could do it overnight. They could support systems like Proportional Representation and Instant Run-Off Voting and eliminate the spoiler effect altogether. Voting systems that the Greens have promoted for years.
Read More

There's also a great way to insure candidates win a majority of the vote. It is called Instant Run-off Voting, or IRV for short. Please check out the Washington based activist group working to bring IRV to Washington State:

http://www.irvwa.org

KVI Radio Debate
570 AM, the Jon Carlson Show
3:30pm Friday, November 4th

Gentry Lange, David Irons, and Ron Sims go head to head one last time. Apparently I am polling better with conservatives since the last KVI debate, so this final debate should be great.

KUOW 94.9FM, Thursday November 3rd, 1:40 to 2pm
I will be on the Conversation.

New King 5 Poll
10/31/2005
The new poll comissioned by King 5 shows that Gentry Lange has gained traction with Republican voters, and has jumped from 1% to 5% Republican support since the last poll. David Irons has lost 2% of his Democratic support, dropping to 13%, while Ron Sims has picked up 2%. So according to the usual media spin, apparently Ron Sims is "stealing" back support from David Irons. Of course, those of us who don't put much stock into biased polls understand that any of these numbers vary widely, and are within the polls margin of error to begin with. So while the media continues to spin their myths, I hold steady at 8% +/- 4%. Anyway, instead of reading the graph, here's where to look for the numbers behind the poll:
Survey USA Website

Eat the State Endorsement
Geov Parrish
http://eatthestate.org/10-04/Election2005Horror.htm

King County Executive: The irony and tragedy of Ron Sims' political career is that he keeps running (and losing) races for higher office by posing as far more liberal than his performance as King County Executive would indicate. Now he wants a third term as Exec, and he's being challenged by David Irons, the same Eastside Robo-Republican that the Party designated a few years ago to take out environmentalist gadfly Brian Derdowski in a King County Council primary. It's a truly unappealing choice. Fortunately, there's a third option -- Gentry Lange, the Green Party candidate. Owing to the Green Party's dysfunction, Lange's campaign has been barely visible, which is a shame: he's smart, articulate, and a way better choice than Sims. Gentry Lange.

[Note from Gentry: Thanks to Geov Parrish for the endorsement, however I have to say that the Greens actually did a lot of work for the campaign. Could we have done better, yes, and we will learn from our mistakes in the future. However, the problems in visibility come more from intentionally exclusion, bureaucratic negligence, and lack of compliance with Washington State's equal access laws on the part of the mainstream media. Just one example: the County Election's own home page did not list me as a candidate until 3 weeks ago. Overcoming the hurdles we face as a party is possible, however, those hurdles are far more detrimental than any failure of the Green Party's volunteers. The Green Party folks have been largely responsible for getting me on the ballot, getting me in the debates, and going door-to-door to get my campaign noticed. Yes we must work twice as hard to be considered half as good, but in that effort the Green's I worked with are incredibly good and dedicated people, and I could not have done it without them.]

GAO Issues a Report on Electronic Voting
The General Accounting Office (Congress) has issued a rather detailed report regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines. The report does a pretty good job highlighting the key concerns that activists have been complaining about for years:

http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20051021122225-53143.pdf

There is also another report our by a group called the National Election Data Archive, or NEDA:

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Presidential-Election-2004.pdf

So while local election officials say everything is fine, Congress has issued a report supporting many of the criticisms activists have raised.

The Election Center report, a corporate Whitewash of King County's Election Problems
NEWS ADVISORY September 29th, 2005
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Election Center Funded by Corporate Voting Machine Providers, Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia and more

King County Council hires the Corporate “Fox” to Whitewash the Election “Hen House”

With the report due anyday, it is unlikely that this corporately funded entity, The Electon Center, will offer real reform or insight. Afterall they take money from the very voting machine companies that our elections in King County are run on.

Read the full press release for more information.


Links

Democratic Underground's Voting Discussion Forums

Blackboxvoting's Discussion Forums

Voters Unite

VerifiedVoting.org